![]() When the service was announced a year ago at CES, Sony Computer Entertainment CEO Andrew House said these titles will be coming. The more reasons someone has to look at the PlayStation Now library, the more likely they are to invest in it. The more classics Sony can pour into the service, the more likely someone is to look at the offerings. As part of a service offering though, the gems from those systems will help create the selling proposition for PlayStation Now. PlayStation and PlayStation 2 titles should be a priority.Īs standalone products, PlayStation and PlayStation 2 games (excepting the rare ones like Suikoden II) are unlikely to bring in huge revenue. At the very least, subscribers should be able to count on Sony’s games appearing on the service. Right now, the library is simply too thin. This includes the HD collections for Sony’s mascot franchises (Jak and Daxter, Ratchet and Clank, and Sly Cooper), the Uncharted series, Killzone, Resistance, LittleBigPlanet, and the rest. Sony should be working to get every first-party title possible on the service as soon as possible. And while third-party arrangements will likely prevent the entire library from being available, "over 100" isn't quite good enough. There are over 800 PlayStation 3 titles on the market. Sony needs to build the foundation of PS Now with first-party titles. Money now is more valuable than money later. Sony can protect itself by only offering the all-in-one for extended periods of time. Bundling would be another way to lure existing customers in. Putting services in silos like this makes it easier for people to ignore them. ![]() ![]() A five or ten percent discount wouldn't amount to much each month, but it would give PlayStation Plus members a nod and suggest that PlayStation Now is part of the larger experience. PlayStation Plus and PlayStation Now are two different services, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be connected in some way to encourage entrenched customers to dig deeper. PlayStation Plus members should be acknowledged with a slight discount. Sony's approach at launch creates confusion and negatively impacts people who have gone all-in with the company. I can play PS Now games on my Vita, but if I have a subscription on my PlayStation 4 and want to continue playing in bed, I need to individually rent the game? That's absurd.Įither PlayStation Now is an service offered on all active PlayStation devices or it's something tied to a specific platform. The reason this is a problem for Sony is because it flies in the face of the company's "PlayStation family" approach. It works for every platform on which Netflix is available (which at this point is everything except my toaster oven). I don't purchase a Netflix streaming subscription for one device. Sony needs to remedy that sooner rather than later. Right now, the PlayStation Now subscription offering is limited to PlayStation 4, though this will change at an unannounced point in the future. The subscription can't be limited to PlayStation 4 for long. Here are a few things Sony can do to sweeten the deal and woo more people to PlayStation Now. ![]() The problem is that PlayStation Now still feels disconnected from the rest of the PlayStation experience. The plan will launch at $19.99 per month or $44.99 for a three-month bundle. If you've been waiting to check out PlayStation 3 titles streaming to your PS4 because you didn't want to rent individual games, a Netflix-style buffet option might be up your alley. Today, Sony announced the oft-requested subscription program for PlayStation Now. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |